@iannyatindo
No bio provided yet.
Member since: July 2026
Role: participant
No recent activity.
No projects yet.
Not coordinating any workgroups yet.
No chair positions yet.
No submissions yet.
I think this draft provides one of the clearest definitions of interoperability as continuity rather than simple portabi…
This framing is very clear. It may also be worth acknowledging that interoperability enables continuity not only of iden…
The distinction between technical connectivity and structural continuity is compelling. It may help to briefly recognize…
This section could also acknowledge that governance continuity depends on participants' understanding of how rules are i…
Alongside contextual information, some portable objects may also depend on temporal context. For rapidly changing inform…
The receipt concept is particularly strong. It may be valuable to clarify whether receipts can also represent subsequent…
This section could also consider signaling when information becomes stale rather than merely degraded. Participants ofte…
The emphasis on explicit degradation is excellent. It may also be useful to distinguish between permanent degradation an…
This draft provides a strong conceptual foundation for epistemic integrity by focusing on the conditions that allow part…
The phrase "socially deceptive" is powerful and captures an important concept. It may be helpful later in the chapter to…
As AI-generated explanations become more common, it may be helpful to distinguish between explanations that summarize ve…
This introduces an important challenge. The chapter might later expand on how interfaces can help participants understan…
The relationship between DP14 and DP15 is well explained. It may also be worth emphasizing that transparency is not only…
This introduction clearly establishes epistemic integrity as the foundation for trustworthy interaction. As the chapter …